Unfortunately Daisy, a well reasoned arguement with data to back it up automatically makes you the worst kind of whiner on slothmud. I have no idea why this mentality exists here, because it completely defies common sense or logic, but that is how it is - I know first hand. Basically, if you have two opposing opinions, party #1 having all the empirical data in the world and a rock-solid arguement, while party #2 has absolutely no evidence to back up their opinion whatsoever, and their idea of a fair discussion consists of name-calling, insults and calling the other party a bunch a whiners who can't hack 'it', then guess what? Party #2 will win every time here.
It's very frustrating, and I can understand your point, but it is highly likely you'll get nowhere with it except to end up holding a resentment, which really is going to be to sloth's detriment in the long run as you will be just one more person playing here who is now unwilling to help with the development of the mud, but hey, nobody gives a toss. Your suggestions, ideas and input are discouraged here, as ridiculous as that may sound.. - really it's a case of either accepting things as they are, or leaving. If I didn't have a better set of moral values, I'd be tempted to turn all my characters into pthieves and go loose just out of retaliation for some of the obtuse thinking I encounter here.. fortunately I'm not inclined to make innocent people suffer in order to vent my frustrations.
