R.I.P. Heath

[jezer]

[quote="Tap":gy5g03qz]So what again was keeping you from finding a job on dry land?And if your NOT on the pipe, what does any of this have to do with Heath Ledger?[/quote:gy5g03qz]

Tap, nothing of this has to do with Heath Ledger, and my last post was all a joke by the way... if you didn't realize... But it did serve a purpose, and it answered more questions than you'll know.

[jezer]

[quote="Weasel":6wtqw7zj]So I'm going to become a cheeseburger? Or maybe a pizza? [/quote:6wtqw7zj]

So that's what the smell was in the chop group!

Its just Charles Darwin's theory really, you start life is a microscopic cell and then evolve into a Chicken and BBQ pizza... Chicken and BBQ of course being the natural selection.

[Tap]

Charles Darwin died believing in God. Score one for the good guys.

[jezer]

[quote="Tap":1ckjkcp0]Charles Darwin died believing in God. Score one for the good guys.[/quote:1ckjkcp0]

That's true, in fact, after he made his theory, he spent the rest of his life disproving it... and I think scientifically he did..? but no one remembers that... Now days the scientific community accept there are gapping big holes in evolution.

People like to select there own truth... I like this idea, so I will believe in it and say it's true... But if we are made by "some thing else" shouldn't there "truth" over write ours? I think so.

[Zukt]

[quote="jezer":37ew7dsx][quote="Tap":37ew7dsx]Charles Darwin died believing in God. Score one for the good guys.[/quote:37ew7dsx]

That's true, in fact, after he made his theory, he spent the rest of his life disproving it... and I think scientifically he did..? but no one remembers that...[/quote:37ew7dsx]
Goddamn you're both bloody ignorant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin

You know you're on this thing called the internet where you could actually look stuff up before making wildy false claims.
[quote:37ew7dsx]Now days the scientific community accept there are gapping big holes in evolution.[/quote:37ew7dsx]
There's a place on the Kansas board of edumacation for you yet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution

Pick you're favorite one and get back to me.

[quote:37ew7dsx]People like to select there own truth... I like this idea, so I will believe in it and say it's true... But if we are made by "some thing else" shouldn't there "truth" over write ours? I think so.[/quote:37ew7dsx]
Philosophy ain't you're strong suit. Engaging in solipsist epistimology is at best masturbation, but at least its not your tautology conjoined with a contradiction.

[Weasel]

[img:6063hmf8]http://msn.mess.be/data/media/14/bang.gif[/img:6063hmf8]

[jezer]

[quote="Zukt":3rl3of5v]Rar Rar Rar[/quote:3rl3of5v]

Sorry Zukt, if my hilly billy intelligence is not up to scratch. I might have more to say about your post, but I don't understand those big words.


I checked into some of your claims and it is true that Darwin was said to have recanted his theory... but there is little evidence... so it's a battle that can't be won.

disengage zukt
recall
cast 'invisibility' jezer

[Fable]

He may not have cleric/mage. But he does have necro and can cast
detect invis. Also he can quaff yellow potion .

[Alberich]

[quote="Zukt":v2dln46u][quote="jezer":v2dln46u][quote="Tap":v2dln46u]Charles Darwin died believing in God. Score one for the good guys.[/quote:v2dln46u]

That's true, in fact, after he made his theory, he spent the rest of his life disproving it... and I think scientifically he did..? but no one remembers that...[/quote:v2dln46u]
Goddamn you're both bloody ignorant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin

You know you're on this thing called the internet where you could actually look stuff up before making wildy false claims.
[quote:v2dln46u]Now days the scientific community accept there are gapping big holes in evolution.[/quote:v2dln46u]
There's a place on the Kansas board of edumacation for you yet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objections_to_evolution

Pick you're favorite one and get back to me.

[quote:v2dln46u]People like to select there own truth... I like this idea, so I will believe in it and say it's true... But if we are made by "some thing else" shouldn't there "truth" over write ours? I think so.[/quote:v2dln46u]
Philosophy ain't you're strong suit. Engaging in solipsist epistimology is at best masturbation, but at least its not your tautology conjoined with a contradiction.[/quote:v2dln46u]


citing wikipedia does not add validity to your argument - it's on par with citing CNN or Pravda

[Weasel]

[quote="Alberich":2hyqa47d]citing wikipedia does not add validity to your argument - it's on par with citing CNN or Pravda[/quote:2hyqa47d]

LOL..

[img:2hyqa47d]http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/images/2007/12/15/internettruth.jpg[/img:2hyqa47d]

[Zukt]

[quote:w7eiyyf0]citing wikipedia does not add validity to your argument - it's on par with citing CNN or Pravda[/quote:w7eiyyf0]

Right, because CNN and Pravda cite their sources with the same rigor as wikipedia.

This sort of argument to attack wikipedia is just plain dumb.

[Avatar]

The wiki article for Darwin lists some 200 citations and references for their information. If you don't believe the content on wikipedia, you could always refer to those sources for more information.

Some people will always try to interpret facts to support their own beliefs. I guess I won't point out specific groups, because everyone does this to some extent.

[jezer]

As much as I may regret this later...

Wiki, is just plain dodgey... You don't have to look far... On the discussion page, one click away... someone is asking why the Charles Darwin entry is biased? See for yourself...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Charl ... s_in_it.3F

My bet is one day it's edited by stubborn atheist evolutionists, and the next day self righteous creationists.

There has been a war going between evolutionists and creationists ever since Darwin came up with his ideas. It's all about whose right and whose wrong... so in another words... it's all about how good THEY are... no one really gives a stuff about Darwin. The whole argument is about really about arrogance and pride, and both sides seem to go to new levels in it everyday. Hardened Hearts, Blinded eyes the lot of them.

(Evolutonist) The white bucket is pink! (Creationist) No the white bucket is blue! Rar, Rar, Rar...

People will believe what they want to believe... and just because you believe it doesn't mean that it is the truth! That goes for everything!

This is why I believe that there must be truth outside of mankind, because mankind obviously has no clue, if it can't even believe the same stupid thing!

[Rynquald]

I'm pretty sure the argument is more about a rather important point in understanding the history of our planet(and species).

Without entering into the debate of the ages, belief isn't really a factor. No one should "believe" in evolution, it's a theory, either you think the evidence sufficiently supports the theory, or you don't. Belief implies some kind of loyalty to the theory, and I'm sure no one needs to be told how that can end up.

Obviously belief is a major factor on the creationism side of the fence, and therein lies the crux of the problem. Belief verses evidence is an impossible battle, evidence can not sway those who believe something the evidence contradicts, and the beliefs of others will not sway those who weigh the evidence.

Just for the record, I'm not an atheist, and I don't believe in creationism, so everyone can take all that however they want. Just my two cents

[tincts]

Top post Jo