SOme interesting stats...
Here are some benchmark tests completed with version 1.13 using the Mushclient benchmarks at
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/benchmarks.htm
We need to run them again since we can now create scripts using C# and VB.NET because a couple of the test results for wintin would be much faster such as the incremental one...
display the file
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/termcap
Mushclient: 0.4 secs
Wintin: 0.5 secs
Zmud: 1.7 secs
display the file
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/high.txt
Mushclient: 0.7 secs
Wintin: 0.7 secs
Zmud: 2.3 secs
display the file
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/high.txt in Arial font
Wintin doesn't support proportional fonts.
display the file
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/high.txt with 10
specified non-matching triggers
Mushclient 1.0 secs
Wintin: 0.7 secs
Zmud: 2.3 secs
display the file
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/high.txt with 5
additional triggers matching a, b, c, d e that set a variable when matched
Mushclient: 16 secs
Wintin 1.6 secs
Zmud: 2.8 secs
run a script that increments a variable from 1 to 1,000,000
Mushclient: 3 secs
Wintin: 28 secs
Zmud 75 secs
display the file
http://www.gammon.com.au/mushclient/mxplog.txt with no
triggers
Mushclient: 3.6 secs
Wintin: 5 secs
test environment:
client machine: AMD 2.2GHz, Windows XP
host: intel based Linux
10 Mbit/sec LAN