random comments about nothing in particular

[Autolycos]

[quote="brady":byp6637m]
[i:byp6637m][b:byp6637m]7 Firebrand 99 [/b:byp6637m][/i:byp6637m][/quote:byp6637m]

tankin grymlyns aint easy

[Yinao]

Someone please explain wtf over takes nearly three minutes to get a successful berserk at 85%?

berserk
Visions of fluffy kittens and the singing of birds distract you.

<911/962hp 147/326/+20ma 57/250>
berserk
Visions of fluffy kittens and the singing of birds distract you.

<916/962hp 148/326/+20ma 60/250>
berserk
Visions of fluffy kittens and the singing of birds distract you.

<923/962hp 150/326/+20ma 63/250>
berserk
Visions of fluffy kittens and the singing of birds distract you.

<928/962hp 151/326/+20ma 65/250>
berserk
You release your hate and anger in an enraged attack.

berserk - Lvl: 11, Learned 85%

........................................................................................................

[Autolycos]

have you ever thought for a minute that you just might really like KITTENS!!!!

[Tap]

I take a break from Sloth and go to my local steakhouse called Santa Fe. I sit down and order an appetizer and sweet tea and look over the menu. Hrm.. a nice New York strip would be good tonite. I place my order, make small talk with the wife and we look at the pictures/memorobilla on the walls and admire the stuffed animals they have on display. So far so good... it seems like its going to be a decent evening...

So, our waitress brings out our meals and right there... in the very center of my steak... is a goddamned plastic pirate sword. WTF!!!!!!

I blame Auto

[Weasel]

[quote="Tap":3a0anndy]I take a break from Sloth and go to my local [b:3a0anndy]streakhouse[/b:3a0anndy].. [/quote:3a0anndy]
streakhouse? [i:3a0anndy]streakhouse[/i:3a0anndy]?
so.. you went to a nudie bar.. with your Mrs...

[Autolycos]

[quote="Tap":mzbvt451]So, our waitress brings out our meals and right there... in the very center of my steak... is a goddamned plastic pirate sword. WTF!!!!!!

I blame Auto [/quote:mzbvt451]

*snicker..

Finally our diabolical plan to infiltrate all of the sliced bovine broiling establishments are coming to fruition.

[angel]

> Seda -- 'The bank teller tells you 'Cizin just deposited 127500000 coins into
your account'

'<1206hp 9ma 206mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt uYou grouptell: '[Legends] !!'

'<1206hp 9ma 206mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt u were at bank grr
You grouptell: '[Legends] u were at bank grr'

'<1206hp 14ma 211mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
Cizin -- 'u made me broke ! shame on you '

'<1206hp 15ma 212mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt lol
You grouptell: '[Legends] lol'

'<1206hp 18ma 215mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt Seda -- 'heh'

'<1206hp 19ma 215mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt Cizin -- 'women !'

'<1206hp 21ma 215mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
Seda -- 'laugh'

'<1206hp 21ma 215mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt
You grouptell: '[Legends] '

'<1206hp 23ma 215mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
gt i agSeda -- 'strut'

'<1206hp 27ma 215mv>[-1.4] [+11h - +12d] [58058] [-2] [Bal Harbor Town]
Seda -- 'women! yes'

[PolkAdotS]

[quote="Tap":43833882] So far so good... it seems like its going to be a decent evening...

So, our waitress brings out our meals and right there... in the very center of my steak...
I blame Auto
[/quote:43833882]
Well, that break from sloth seemed to have lasted you around dinner? That must be the key to it all, post on every thread then when anyone posts anywhere you can say they haven't posted at all, ever. I see how your evil ways works Tap, you go out to dinner, eat a pirate sword, and come home and spam this website with posts about how other people don't know how to play. You must be uhm... bored? (loser)

[Tap]

Wow!! You responded to a post 6 days old. You are sharp as a knife. I'm telling you guys, don't mess with PoldAdotS. Scold points on pointing me out as a loser.

[PolkAdotS]

Tap this profile didn't exist 6 days ago... I am making up for lost time, and permenantly ignoring you.

[jezer]

[img:289c22cn]http://ministrywatchman.com/wp-content/uploads/argue.jpg[/img:289c22cn]

[img:289c22cn]http://www.weirdthings.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/cat-fight-gets-dangerous-a-knife-has-been-pulled-out.jpg[/img:289c22cn]

[Weasel]

Pelosi is a fapping b*tch. Months ago Pelosi screamed over and over (like the harpy she is) that Iran was not involved in supporting insurgents in Iraq, despite proof to the contrary, and accused Bush & co of manufacturing evidence in order to provoke hostilities with Iran and go ahead with the 'surge'. Of course the MSM supported her, and a huge amount of the citizens of USA followed along with the spoonfed lies like a bunch of stupid lemmings.

Now the surge appears to have actually given results, guess what this b*tch Pelosi is saying now? She's saying that "the success of the surge is due to the goodwill of the Iranians - that the Iranians decided in Basra when the fighting would end". Yeah that's right, According to Pelosi, the Iranians that were in no way involved in fighting in Basra, have stopped fighting in Basra. Unbelievable.

There is no way this hate-filled b*tch should be in the position she is, when clearly her judgment is clouded by her overwhelming hatred of anything to do with Bush or the military. IMPEACH PELOSI!

[Tap]

You'd be better off sitting back and enjoying your cup of coffee and enjoy the ride. The next 2-4 years will certainly "change" the way you have lived.

[*juggleblood*]

[quote="Weasel":15j72vi3] that Iran was not involved in supporting insurgents in Iraq, despite proof to the contrary,....Now the surge appears to have actually given results, [/quote:15j72vi3]

So which ones are the insurgents Weasel? The Shiites in the south, moktada al-sadr and his mahdi army in baghdad, the secular sunni's in baghdad, the sunni tribesmen in the northwest, the al-qaeda aligned sunni elements (tiny in number), the kurdish separationists, or the oppressed turkmen in the north?

Which one are we helping to win? Which one is Iran helping to win? What does a win entail? What are these 'results' of which you speak and the 'proof'? The situation is growing worse, not better and the political situation is still at a standstill. We're still trying to subdue the Shiites in Bagdhad for Christ sake and they were the ones we were supposedly liberating!

Iran hasn't attacked another country in modern history, however they were attacked by a US sponsored Iraq in the 80's. They certainly have more of an interest in stability in Iraq than we do, given it's on their border.

You sound like you know about as much as Pelosi or McCain.

[Weasel]

[quote="juggleblood":101a3yoc][quote="Weasel":101a3yoc] that Iran was not involved in supporting insurgents in Iraq, despite proof to the contrary,....Now the surge appears to have actually given results, [/quote:101a3yoc]

So which ones are the insurgents Weasel? The Shiites in the south, moktada al-sadr and his mahdi army in baghdad, the secular sunni's in baghdad, the sunni tribesmen in the northwest, the al-qaeda aligned sunni elements (tiny in number), the kurdish separationists, or the oppressed turkmen in the north?

Which one are we helping to win? Which one is Iran helping to win? What does a win entail? What are these 'results' of which you speak and the 'proof'? The situation is growing worse, not better and the political situation is still at a standstill. We're still trying to subdue the Shiites in Bagdhad for Christ sake and they were the ones we were supposedly liberating!

Iran hasn't attacked another country in modern history, however they were attacked by a US sponsored Iraq in the 80's. They certainly have more of an interest in stability in Iraq than we do, given it's on their border.

You sound like you know about as much as Pelosi or McCain.[/quote:101a3yoc]

I really hope you are kidding - have you had your head buried in the sand for the last month? Regardless, you completely ignored the subject of my post and made your 'argument' response about something else. I posted about PELOSI, not a fapping debate about the rights or wrongs of the war itself. If you're going to make a response, at least try exercising a modicum of intelligence and make it relevant.

How about you go read my post again, then try looking at a newspaper - if you can find one that isn't full of liberal bullsh*t - and you will know that the surge has worked in decreasing the violence in Iraq - there's plenty of statistical and empirical evidence of that (heck, even Pelosi admits to that much!). You missed the point entirely though, which is this: Americans were being killed by Iranian supplied weapons and IEDs and EFPs - and there is no doubt about this. Who used those Iranian supplied weapons is not the point in this post, try as hard as you might to make it that point in your apparent defense of Pelosi. The point is Pelosi is crediting the huge decrease in violence to the very people who were effectively underwriting it, and that is after saying earlier they were not involved. How can ANYONE not see the sheer hypocrisy in that is beyond me, but apparently you can't.

Why are you defending Iran? They have stated categorically they want to nuke Israel. They are killing American troops in a war zone. And you are defending them. What does that make you?

Get a fapping clue.

And for the record, I do not support McCain. I do not like war. BUT my post was about Pelosi. Period.