I have no quarrel with you, but since you insist on continuing to flame me, I am compelled to respond.
I ceased flaming anyone after my first post as I was too humbled by your scintillating scoffing to dare flame anyone ever again. Truly, it is a superior method of flaming others that I cannot match, for haughtiness ill suits me, but fits you just right.
Through my dastardly powers, I have "Once again..., twisted [your] words and implied that [you] find [my] suggestions to be 'unproductive to the thread'!" So great am I that I have taken Angels' words and somehow retroactively twisted them into Ezekiel's! OoOooooh! Fiend!
Thank you for not putting words in the mouth of others, but choosing to take them as your own instead. Shame that you took only what you wanted from my post rather than what I actually said. Hey, that rhymes!
Anyways, my apologies to those with delicate sensibilities for this slight sidetrack. I have already spoken my piece on this 'drastic' succor business, but now, I am curious to know: What is the current immortal progress regarding a decison on further changes to succor? Are you still entertaining ideas, or have you decided already? Can we expect succor from this 'drastic' change any time soon? We're all 'struggl[ing]' (apparently)!
Thanks for listening.
See you next complaint!
*scoff* *scoff* *scoff* (hm! Seems I have a scold! Time to see a doctor!)
Acedia++
